爆料王

Unit outline_

ASNS3690: Researching Asia

Semester 2, 2023 [Normal day] - Camperdown/Darlington, Sydney

This unit examines the theoretical and methodological underpinnings of studying Asia, including the question 'what is Asia?' The unit examines key Asia-centred approaches to the field, including the critique of Western-centred forms of knowledge. From that basis, students engage critically with significant bodies of literature in different disciplines as the starting point for designing and carry out their own research projects in the field.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Asian Studies
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
12 credit points at 2000 level in Asian Studies
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
CHNS3902 or INMS3902 or JPNS3902 or ASNS3902
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Timothy David Amos, timothy.amos@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Small continuous assessment Classwork
Discussion of set readings and presentations of others
20% - equivalent to 1000wd
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Presentation Presentation of research proposal
Oral presentation of research proposal
10% - equivalent of 500wd
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Draft research proposal
n/a
30% Week 09
Due date: 05 Oct 2023 at 17:00
equivalent to 1500 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Final research proposal
n/a
40% Week 13
Due date: 09 Nov 2023 at 17:00
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO3 LO4 LO5

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Distinction

75 - 84

Credit

65 - 74

Pass

50 - 64

Fail

0 - 49

When you don鈥檛 meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the .

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the .

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a听simple extension.鈥 The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can鈥檛 complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for听special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students,听听includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner鈥檚 Board. The Examiner鈥檚 Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Lecture recording: Most lectures (in recording-equipped venues) will be recorded and may be made available to students on the LMS. However, you should not rely on lecture recording to substitute your classroom learning experience.
  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours鈥 preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Week 1 (August 4) Introduction

Mullaney, Thomas S. and Christopher Rea. Where Research Begins: Choosing a Research Project That Matters to You (and the World). Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2022, 152-174.

Week 2 (August 11) Asian Studies: paradoxes and possibilities

Cribb, Robert. 鈥溾楢 Little Knowledge is a Useful Thing鈥: Paradoxes in the Asian Studies Experience in Australia.鈥 In What about Asia?: Revisiting Asian Studies, edited by J. Stremmelaar and P. van der Velde, 57-68. The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, 2006.

Duara, Prasenjit. 鈥淎sia Redux: Conceptualizing a Region for Our Times.鈥 In Asia Redux: Conceptualizing a Region for Our Times, edited by Presenjit Duara, 5-32. Singapore, ISEAS Publishing, 2013, 5-32.

Week 3 (August 18) Creative Research / Research Ethics

Munro, Doug. 鈥淎utobiography and Faction.鈥 In Bearing Witness: Essays in Honour of Brij V. Lal, edited by Doug Munro and Jack Corbett, 247-272. Canberra, ANU Press, 2017.

Iphofen, Ron. 鈥淎n Introduction to Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity.鈥 In Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity, edited by Ron Iphofen et.al., 3-13. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.听听听听听听听听听听听

Week 4 (August 25) Critical reading and writing

DiYanni, Robert. 鈥淩eading Responsively, Reading Responsibly: An Approach to Critical Reading.鈥 In Critical Reading Across the Curriculum, edited by Robert DiYanni and Anton Borst, 1-23. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

Schostak, John. F. and Jill Schostak. Writing Research Critically: Developing the Power to make a Difference. London: Routledge, 2017, 1-17.

Week 5 (September 1) Theory and engagement

Barshay, Andrew. E. 鈥淲hat is Japan to Us?鈥 In The Humanities and the Dynamics of Inclusion since World War II, edited by David. A. Hollinger, 345-371. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press, 2003, 1-13.

Week 6 (September 8) Asia and Methodological Approaches

Morris-Suzuki, Tessa. 鈥淟iquid Area Studies: Northeast Asia in Motion as Viewed from Mount Geumgang.鈥 Positions: East Asia cultures critique 27, no. 1 (2019): 209-239.

Winichakul, Thongchai. 鈥淭he Changing Landscape of Asian Studies.鈥 Ajia kenkyu 62, no. 1 (2016): 1-8.

Tang, Sheila. 鈥淪exuality in cultural studies: Doing queer research in Asia transnationally.鈥 Cultural Studies Review 25, no. 2 (2019): 72-77.

Week 7 (September 15) History / Asian pasts

Gluck, Carol. 鈥淣ational Pasts as Political Presents: War Memory in East Asia.鈥 In National Memories: Constructing Identity in Populist Times, edited by H. L. Roediger Iii and J. V. Wertsch, 280-299. New York, Oxford University Press, 2022.

Mignolo, Walter. D. Local Histories / Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, N.J, Princeton University Press, 2012, 3-45.

Week 8 (September 22) Politics / Discourse

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 鈥淒evelopment.鈥 In Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon, edited by Adi Ophir, et al., 118-130. New York, NY, Fordham University Press, 2018.

Weiss, M. L. and E. Hansson (2018). 鈥淧articipation and Space: Themes, patterns, and implications.鈥 Political Participation in Asia: Defining & Deploying Political Space. E. Hansson, M. L. Weiss and K. Hewison. New York, Routledge: 206-211.

Kingston, Jeff. The Politics of Religion, Nationalism, and Identity in Asia. Blue Ridge Summit: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2019, 1-14.

Week 9 (October 6) Cultural Studies

Chua, Beng Huat. 鈥淐onceptualizing an East Asian Popular Culture." Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 5, no. 2 (2004): 200-221.

Turner, Graeme. Essays in Media and Cultural Studies: In Transition. Abingdon: Routledge, 2019, 145-155.

Week 10 (October 13) Society / Ethnography

Geertz, Clifford. 鈥淒eep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.鈥 Daedalus 134, no. 4 (Fall 2005): 56-86.

Kano, Ayako. 鈥淭he Future of Gender in Japan: Work/Life Balance and Relations between the Sexes.鈥 In Japan: The Precarious Future, edited by Frank Baldwin and Anne Allison, 87-109. New York: New York University Press, 2013.

Week 11 (October 20) Religion

Bryan S. Turner and Oscar Salemink, 鈥淚ntroduction: Constructing Religion and Religions in Asia.鈥 In Routledge Handbook of Religions in Asia, edited by Oscar Salemink and Bryan S. Turner, 1-14. London: Routledge, 2015.

Jason Ananda Josephson, 鈥淭he Invention of Religions in East Asia.鈥 In Routledge Handbook of Religions in Asia, edited by Oscar Salemink and Bryan S. Turner, 17-29. London: Routledge, 2015.

Week 12 (October 27) Cinema Studies

Aaron Han Joon Magnan-Park, Gina Marchetti, and See Kam Tan, 鈥溾楢sia鈥 and Asian Cinema,鈥 The Palgrave Handbook of Asian Cinema, edited by Magnan-Park, Han Joon Aaron, Gina Marchetti, and See Kam Tan, 1-12. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2018.

Derek Hon-kong Lam, 鈥淐inema and Development: Towards an Ideological History of Asian Cinema as 鈥榃orld Cinema,鈥欌 The Palgrave Handbook of Asian Cinema, edited by Magnan-Park, Han Joon Aaron, Gina Marchetti, and See Kam Tan, 53-70. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2018.

Week 13 (November 3) Research Close-up

Introduction to Buraku and Outcaste Studies

Amos, Timothy D., et al. 鈥淒oing Violence to Buraku History: J. Mark Ramseyer's Dangerous Inventions.鈥 Japan Focus: The Asia Pacific Journal 19. No.9 (2021): 1-25.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. analyse secondary scholarship well enough to classify the discipline, approaches, and judge the quality of arguments and sources
  • LO2. apply previous learning to discerning Orientalist narratives and effectively discuss how to undermine corrosive stereotypes
  • LO3. engage in debates that are based on fact, are professional, ethical, and convincing
  • LO4. use library and archival resources to identify reliable information; you should also be able to discern how reliable information is based on a variety of factors
  • LO5. produce a research proposal that draws on relevant scholarship and other sources.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all 爆料王 graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one鈥檚 personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

No changes have been made since this unit was last offered'

Disclaimer

Important: the 爆料王 regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an .