爆料王

Unit outline_

FILM4114: The Cinematic Experience

Semester 2, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

What is the cinematic experience today, in an age of fragmented audiences and multiple platform delivery? Taking the film festival as its central case study, this unit examines the festival as a cultural institution, as a site for the making of film history, and as a scene of the curious mixture of the festive and the cerebral, the sensual and the serious.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Film Studies
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Susan Potter, susan.potter@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research essay
n/a
60% -
Due date: 13 Nov 2022 at 23:59
4000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Presentation Presentation 1
n/a
20% Multiple weeks 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3
Presentation Presentation 2
n/a
20% Multiple weeks 1000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Distinction

75 - 84

Credit

65 - 74

Pass

50 - 64

Fail

0 - 49

When you don鈥檛 meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the .

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the .

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a听simple extension.鈥 The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can鈥檛 complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for听special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students,听听includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 02 The cinematic experience now鈥2gather-a-part co-vid exquisite corpse series Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 03 Excavating cinema鈥檚 mobile virtual gaze鈥擯iccadilly (E. A. Dupont, UK, 1929) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 04 Cinematic assemblages鈥擣aces Places (Agn猫s Varda and JR, France, 2017) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 05 World cinema and the festival鈥擳he World (Jia Zhangke, China, 2004) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 06 Queer cinema in the world鈥擟ircumstance (Maryam Keshavarz, France/US/Iran, 2011) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 07 Portable cinema鈥攖est reels, smartphone media, the Internet Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 08 Microcinema鈥擧ale County This Morning, This Evening (RaMell Ross, US, 2018) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 09 Cinematic milieu鈥擠omitilla I (DAAR Communication, Nigeria, 1996) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 10 Reading week鈥攖heses due end of the week Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 11 Cinematic milieu鈥攕ite visit tba Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 12 Room for play鈥擳oni Erdmann (Maren Ade, Germany, 2016) Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3
Week 13 Research essay workshop Seminar (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance: According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner鈥檚 Board. The Examiner鈥檚 Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.

  • Preparation: Students should commit to spend approximately three hours鈥 preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

DETAILED SCHEDULE OF READINGS & FILMS

Note: films and readings are indicative and may be revised.

1 Introduction

No screening. No reading.

2 The cinematic experience now鈥2gather-a-part co-vid exquisite corpse series (https://vimeo.com/showcase/7024910)

Gaudreault, Andr茅, and Philippe Marion. 鈥淐hapter One: Cinema Is Not What It Used to Be.鈥 The End of Cinema?: A Medium in Crisis in the Digital Age. The End of Cinema? Columbia University Press, 2015.

Thain, Alanna, and Dayna McLeod. 鈥淐inema鈥檚 Missing Bodies.鈥 Framework 62, no. 2 (2021): 223鈥41. Click on the QR codes in the essay to access all audio files.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Hansen, M. 鈥淓arly Cinema, Late Cinema: Permutations of the Public Sphere.鈥 Screen 34, no. 3 (1993): 197鈥210.

Casetti, Francesco. The Lumi猫re Galaxy: Seven Key Words for the Cinema to Come. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

3 Excavating cinema鈥檚 mobile virtual gaze鈥Piccadilly (E. A. Dupont, UK, 1929)

Friedberg, Anne. Chapter One 鈥淭he mobilized and virtual gaze in modernity: Fl芒neur/flaneuse,鈥 15-38, in Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

Friedberg, Anne. Chapter Two 鈥淭he passage from arcade to cinema,鈥 47-94, in Window Shopping: Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam. 鈥淭he Imperial Imaginary.鈥 In Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media (London: Routledge, 1994).

鈥淰ictorian Popular Culture - Adam Matthew Digital.鈥 Accessed July 13, 2021. . See the Quick Link on the home page to the 鈥淥ptical Entertainments鈥 digital exhibition.

4 Cinematic assemblages鈥Faces Places (Agn猫s Varda and JR, France, 2017)

Casetti, Francesco. 鈥淎ssemblage.鈥 In The Lumi猫re Galaxy: Seven Key Words for the Cinema to Come. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

Martin, Adrian. 鈥淭urn the Page: From Mise En Sc猫ne to Dispositif.鈥 Screening the Past (2011)

SUPPLEMENTARY

Agamben, Giorgio. 鈥淲hat Is an Apparatus?鈥 In What Is an Apparatus? And Other Essays, 1鈥24. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009.

5 World cinema and the festival鈥The World (Jia Zhangke, China, 2004)

Andrew, Dudley. 2009. 鈥淭ime Zones and Jet Lag: The Flows and Phases of World Cinema.鈥 In World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, edited by Nata拧a Durovicov谩 and Kathleen E. Newman. Taylor & Francis.

de Valck, Marijke. 鈥淐annes and the Alternative Cinema Network: Bridging the Gap between Cultural Criteria and Business Demands,鈥 85-121. In Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007. 36pp eBook

SUPPLEMENTARY

Appadurai, Arjun. 鈥淐hapter 2: Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy,鈥 27-47. In Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

La Dolce Vita (Federico Fellini, Italy, 1960)

6 Queer cinema in the world鈥Circumstance (Maryam Keshavarz, France/US/Iran, 2011)

Schoonover, Karl, and Rosalind Galt. 鈥淚ntroduction.鈥 In Queer Cinema in the World. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.

Schoonover, Karl, and Rosalind Galt. Chapter 2 鈥淎 Worldly Affair: Queer Film Festivals and Global Space.鈥 In Queer Cinema in the World. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Robertson, Roland. 鈥淕localization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity.鈥 In Global Modernities, 25鈥44. Edited by Mike Featherstone, Scott Lash & Roland Robertson. London: SAGE Publications, 1995.

Juhasz, Alexandra, and Ming-Yuen S. Ma. 鈥淨ueer Media Manifestos.鈥 GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 19, no. 4 (2013): 559鈥74. [e-journal]

7 Portable cinema鈥攖est reels, smartphone media, the Internet

Wasson, Haidee. 鈥淚ntroduction: Portability and Projectability鈥 and Chapter 4 鈥淧ortable Projects and the Electronic Age.鈥 Everyday Movies: Portable Film Projectors and the Transformation of American Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2020.

Kn枚rer, Ekkehard. 鈥淢ovable Images on Portable Devices.鈥 In Screen Dynamics: Mapping the Borders of Cinema, edited by Gertrud Koch, Volker Pantenburg, and Simon Roth枚hler, 169鈥78. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Pilcher, Lauren. 鈥淨ueer Theory and Nontheatrical Films: Perversion in the Public Domain.鈥 In The Oxford Handbook of Queer Cinema, edited by Ronald Gregg and Amy Villarejo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

8 Microcinema鈥Hale County This Morning, This Evening (RaMell Ross, US, 2018)

Shambu, Girish. 鈥淢aking a Home for Film, Making Film a Home: The Nomadic Cinephilia of Ruun Nuur.鈥 Framework 62, no. 2 (2021): 199鈥209.

De Ville, Donna. 鈥淭he Persistent Transience of Microcinema (in the United States and Canada).鈥 Film History: An International Journal 27, no. 3 (2015): 104鈥36.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Koyaanisqatsi (Godfrey Reggio, US, 1982).

Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam. 鈥淭he Politics of Multiculturalism in the Postmodern Age.鈥 In Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media (London: Routledge, 1994).

MID-SEMESTER BREAK

9 Cinematic milieu鈥Domitilla I (DAAR Communication, Nigeria, 1996) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQZSr92n2Hw

Canguilhem, Georges. (1952) 2001. 鈥淭he Living and Its Milieu,鈥 translated by John Savage. Grey Room, no. 3: 7鈥31.

Larkin, Brian. 鈥淭he Cinematic Milieu.鈥 Public Culture 33, no. 3 (2021): 313鈥48.

SUPPLEMENTARY

Okome, Onookome. 2007. 鈥淣ollywood: Spectatorship, Audience, and the Sites of Consumption.鈥 Postcolonial Text 3, no. 2.

Steyerl, Hito. 2009. 鈥淚n Defense of the Poor Image.鈥 In The Wretched of the Screen, 31鈥45. Berlin: Sternberg.

10 Reading week鈥攖heses due end of the week

11 Cinematic milieu鈥攕ite visit tba

12 Room for playToni Erdmann (Maren Ade, Germany, 2016)

Hansen, Miriam Bratu. 鈥淩oom-for-Play: Benjamin鈥檚 Gamble with Cinema.鈥 Canadian Journal of Film Studies/Revue Canadienne d鈥櫭﹖udes Cinematographiques 13, no. 1 (2004): 2鈥27.

Benjamin, Walter. 鈥淭he Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility [Second Version].鈥 In The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media, edited by Michael W. Jennings, Brigid Doherty, and Thomas Y. Levin, translated by Edmund Jephcott, 19鈥55. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.

13 Research essay workshop

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. synthesize disparate film concepts from different disciplines and fields of expertise
  • LO2. analyze, critique and ecaluate different critical and theoretical positions and approaches
  • LO3. present complex ideas succinctly and coherently.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all 爆料王 graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one鈥檚 personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

Topic content has been revised.

Disclaimer

Important: the 爆料王 regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an .