爆料王

Unit outline_

GCST6901: Cultural Policy

Semester 1, 2022 [Normal day] - Remote

This unit examines cultural policy across a range of sectors such as museums and heritage, the arts, media, and the cultural industries. It will provide theoretical perspectives and practical insight into policy formation processes in Australia and internationally. The multiple actors and rationales that shape policy and ground claims for its relevance amid social change and cultural diversity are considered. Students learn how to analyse policies in relation to the institutional, social and political contexts of their emergence.

Unit details and rules

Academic unit Gender and Cultural Studies
Credit points 6
Prerequisites
? 
None
Corequisites
? 
None
Prohibitions
? 
None
Assumed knowledge
? 

None

Available to study abroad and exchange students

Yes

Teaching staff

Coordinator Josto Luzzu, josto.luzzu@sydney.edu.au
Type Description Weight Due Length
Assignment Research essay
Student will execute the research they proposed in their essay proposal.
50% Formal exam period
Due date: 06 Jun 2022 at 23:59
3000 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Participation Tutorial participation
Participation will be either online via Zoom or in-person
10% Ongoing n/a
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Assignment Policy analysis
Analysis of a chosen policy selected from a list provided by the lecturer.
30% Week 06
Due date: 29 Mar 2022 at 23:59
1250 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO5
Assignment Research plan
Research plan in preparation for final research essay
10% Week 11
Due date: 10 May 2022 at 23:59
250 words
Outcomes assessed: LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4

Assessment summary

Detailed information for each assessment can be found on Canvas.

Assessment criteria

The University awards common result grades, set out in the (Schedule 1).

As a general guide, a High distinction indicates work of an exceptional standard, a Distinction a very high standard, a credit a good standard, and a pass an acceptable standard.

Result name

Mark range

Description

High distinction

85 - 100

Work is of an exceptional quality and demonstrates independent learning and application of course content. Learning outcomes are met.

Distinction

75 - 84

Work is of a high quality and demonstrates a strong understanding of the course content and learning outcomes.

Credit

65 - 74

Work demonstrates a good understanding of the course content and learning outcomes.

Pass

50 - 64

Work demonstrates some understanding of the course content and learning outcomes .

Fail

0 - 49

Work does not meet the learning outcomes of the unit to a satisfactory standard.

.

For more information see guide to grades.

Late submission

In accordance with University policy, these penalties apply when written work is submitted after 11:59pm on the due date:

  • Deduction of 5% of the maximum mark for each calendar day after the due date.
  • After ten calendar days late, a mark of zero will be awarded.

This unit has an exception to the standard University policy or supplementary information has been provided by the unit coordinator. This information is displayed below:

5% per day in accordance with University policy.

Academic integrity

The Current Student website provides information on academic integrity and the resources available to all students. The University expects students and staff to act ethically and honestly and will treat all allegations of academic integrity breaches seriously.

We use similarity detection software to detect potential instances of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breach. If such matches indicate evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic integrity breaches, your teacher is required to report your work for further investigation.

Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and automated writing tools

You may only use generative AI and automated writing tools in assessment tasks if you are permitted to by your unit coordinator. If you do use these tools, you must acknowledge this in your work, either in a footnote or an acknowledgement section. The assessment instructions or unit outline will give guidance of the types of tools that are permitted and how the tools should be used.

Your final submitted work must be your own, original work. You must acknowledge any use of generative AI tools that have been used in the assessment, and any material that forms part of your submission must be appropriately referenced. For guidance on how to acknowledge the use of AI, please refer to the .

The unapproved use of these tools or unacknowledged use will be considered a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy and penalties may apply.

Studiosity is permitted unless otherwise indicated by the unit coordinator. The use of this service must be acknowledged in your submission as detailed on the .

Outside assessment tasks, generative AI tools may be used to support your learning. The contains a number of productive ways that students are using AI to improve their learning.

Simple extensions

If you encounter a problem submitting your work on time, you may be able to apply for an extension of five calendar days through a听simple extension.鈥 The application process will be different depending on the type of assessment and extensions cannot be granted for some assessment types like exams.

Special consideration

If exceptional circumstances mean you can鈥檛 complete an assessment, you need consideration for a longer period of time, or if you have essential commitments which impact your performance in an assessment, you may be eligible for听special consideration or special arrangements.

Special consideration applications will not be affected by a simple extension application.

Using AI responsibly

Co-created with students,听听includes lots of helpful examples of how students use generative AI tools to support their learning. It explains how generative AI works, the different tools available and how to use them responsibly and productively.

WK Topic Learning activity Learning outcomes
Week 01 Introduction (culture + policy) Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 02 Cultural policy in Australia Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 1 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 03 'Valuing' culture Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 2 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 04 The 'creative cities' debate Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 3 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 05 Policy analysis consultation week Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 06 Cultural policy as public policy Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 5 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 07 Between State and Screen Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 6 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 09 Creative labourers Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 8 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 10 Research essay reading/consultation week Workshop (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 11 Audiences and participation Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 10 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 12 Museums, digital media and the pandemic Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 11 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Week 13 Overview, reflections and final essay workshop Lecture (2 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5
Tutorial 12 Tutorial (1 hr) LO1 LO2 LO3 LO4 LO5

Attendance and class requirements

  • Attendance:听According to Faculty Board Resolutions, students in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences are expected to attend 90% of their classes. If you attend less than 50% of classes, regardless of the reasons, you may be referred to the Examiner鈥檚 Board. The Examiner鈥檚 Board will decide whether you should pass or fail the unit of study if your attendance falls below this threshold.
  • Participation:听Besides turning up to lectures and tutorials, which are a requirement for passing the course, you are also expected to have completed the set readings and to be prepared to discuss these in tutorials, including leading the discussion in one specific week. This week will be allocated in the first tutorial. You will be marked on:

    鈥 preparedness: on having completed the set readings and turning up to tutorials.

    鈥 contribution to discussion: on your willingness to engage in informed and productive discussion and debate.

    鈥 conduct: on being able to engage in debate respectfully and constructively with your peers.

    Participation through Canvas forums will also contribute to your participation grade.
  • Lecture recording:听Lectures will be delivered live听and recorded. Every lecture will be made available to students on Canvas. As tutorials follow the lecture, please ensure you have accessed this recording before attending your tutorial.
  • Preparation:听Students should commit to spend approximately three hours鈥 preparation time (reading, studying, homework, essays, etc.) for every hour of scheduled instruction.

Study commitment

Typically, there is a minimum expectation of 1.5-2 hours of student effort per week per credit point for units of study offered over a full semester. For a 6 credit point unit, this equates to roughly 120-150 hours of student effort in total.

Required readings

Required readings听听

All readings appear in Canvas under the 鈥楻eading List鈥 tab.

Week 1 (22 Feb): Introduction

Required Readings:听

Rosenstein, C. (2018), Chapter 2 鈥榃hat is Cultural Policy?鈥 in听Understanding Cultural Policy, Routledge, pp. 48-69.听

Mulcahy, K. V. (2006). 鈥楥ultural Policy: Definitions and Theoretical Approaches鈥,听Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 35.4: 319鈥330.

Week 2 (1 Mar): Cultural Policy in Australia

Required readings:

Craik, J., McAllister, L., & Davis, G. (2003). 鈥楶aradoxes and contradictions in government approaches to contemporary cultural policy: an Australian perspective鈥,听International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9.1: 17鈥33.

Caust, J. (2019) 鈥楾he continuing saga around arts funding and the cultural wars in Australia鈥,听International Journal of Cultural Policy, 25.6: 765-779.

Recommended readings:

Eltham, B. & Verhoeven, D. (2020) 鈥楢 鈥渘atural experiment鈥 in Australian cultural policy: Australian Government funding cuts disproportionately affect companies that produce more new work and have larger audiences鈥,听International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26.1: 81-94.

Rowe, D. et al (2016) 鈥楾ransforming cultures? From听Creative Nation听to听Creative Australia鈥,听Media International Australia, 158.1: 6-16.

Week 3 (8 Mar): 鈥榁aluing鈥 culture

Required readings:

C. Gray (2007) 鈥楥ommodification and Instrumentality in Cultural Policy鈥,听International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13.2: 203-15.

Belfiore, E. (2020) 鈥榃hose cultural value? Representation, power and creative industries鈥,听International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26.3: 383-397.听

Recommended readings:

Gibson, L. (2008) 鈥業n defence of instrumentality鈥,听Cultural Trends, 17.4: 247-257.

O鈥橞rien, D. (2014) Chapter 6: 鈥楾he Value of Culture鈥 in听Cultural Policy Management: Value and Modernity in the Creative Industries, Routledge, pp. 112-130.

Week 4 (15 Mar): The 鈥楥reative Cities鈥 debate听

Required readings:

A.J. Scott (2006) 鈥楥reative Cities: Conceptual Issues and Policy Questions鈥,听Journal of Urban Affairs, 28.1: 1-17.

L. Kong (2014) 鈥楾ransnational Mobilities and the Making of Creative Cities鈥,听Theory, Culture & Society, 31.7/8: 273鈥289.

Recommended readings:

J. McGuigan (2009) 鈥楧oing a Florida thing: the creative class thesis and cultural policy鈥,听International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15.3: 291-300.

Flew, T. (2013) 鈥業ntroduction: Creative Industries and Urban Development鈥櫶in Creative Industries and Urban Development: Creative Cities in the 21St Century, Routledge, pp.12-61.

Grodach. (2017). Urban cultural policy and creative city making. Cities, 68, 82鈥91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.015

Week 5 (22 Mar): The European Capital of Culture

Required readings:

Mittag, J. (2013), 鈥楾he changing concept of the European Capital of Culture鈥,听in听The Cultural Politics of Europe: European Capitals of Culture and European Union since the 1980s听(Vol. 24). Routledge.听

Sassatelli. (2008). EUROPEAN CULTURAL SPACE IN THE EUROPEAN CITIES OF CULTURE: Europeanization and cultural policy.听European Societies,听10(2), 225鈥245.听

Recommended

Calligaro, O. (2013), 鈥楩lorence as European City of Culture for 1986 and the legitimisation of an EC cultural policy鈥 in听Patel, K. K. (Ed.),听in听The Cultural Politics of Europe: European Capitals of Culture and European Union since the 1980s听(Vol. 24). Routledge.听

Week 6 (29 Mar): Globalization and Cultural Policy

Required

Ryoo. (2009). Globalization, or the logic of cultural hybridization: the case of the Korean wave.听Asian Journal of Communication,听19(2), 137鈥151.听

Lee. (2019) Chapter 6: 鈥楾he Korean Wave Inside Out鈥, in听Cultural Policy in South Korea: Making a New Patron State听(1st ed., Vol. 1). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736617

Recommended readings:

Kwon, & Kim, J. (2014). The cultural industry policies of the Korean government and the Korean Wave. International Journal of Cultural Policy鈥: CP, 20(4), 422鈥439.听

Nam. (2013). The Cultural Political Economy of the Korean Wave in East Asia: Implications for Cultural Globalization Theories. Asian Perspective, 37(2), 209鈥231.听

Policy analysis due.

Week 7 (5 Apr): Neoliberalism and negotiated Cultural Policy

Required Readings

Pholsena. (2006).听Chapter 3: 鈥楥ultural Order and Discipline: The Politics of National Culture鈥, in听Post-war Laos: The Politics of Culture, History and Identity. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Laungaramsri P. (2015) Commodifying Sovereignty: Special Economic Zones and the Neoliberalization of the Lao Frontier. In: Santasombat Y. (eds) Impact of China鈥檚 Rise on the Mekong Region. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au/10.1057/9781137476227_5

Recommended readings

Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a Mobile Technology.听Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,听32(1), 3鈥8. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4639996

Nyiri. (2006). The Yellow Man鈥檚 Burden: Chinese Migrants on a Civilizing Mission.听The China Journal (Canberra, A.C.T.),听56(56), 83鈥106. https://doi.org/10.2307/20066187

Ny铆ri, P. (2016). 2. Realms of Free Trade, Enclaves of Order: Chinese-Built 鈥業nstant Cities鈥 in Northern Laos. In M. Saxer & J. Zhang (Ed.),听The Art of Neighbouring: Making Relations Across China's Borders听(pp. 57-72). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.听

Week 8 (12 Apr): Cultural policy and Street Art

Required readings:

MacDowall. (2006). In Praise of 70K: Cultural Heritage and Graffiti Style.听Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.),听20(4), 471鈥484.听

听 Ulmer. (2017). Writing Urban Space: Street Art, Democracy, and Photographic Cartography. Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, 17(6), 491鈥502.听

Recommended readings:

Bruce, C. (2010) Public Surfaces Beyond the Great Wall: Communication and Graffiti Culture in China. Invisible Culture, 15.

Mcauliffe. (2012). Graffiti or Street Art? Negotiating the Moral Geographies of the Creative City.听Journal of Urban Affairs,听34(2), 189鈥206.听

Week 9 (19 Apr): Creative labourers

Required readings:

McRobbie, A. (2016) 鈥楿npacking the Politics of Creative Labour鈥,听Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries, Polity Press, pp. 33-59.

Comunian, R. & England, L. (2020) 鈥楥reative and cultural work without filters: Covid-19 and exposed precarity in the creative economy鈥,听Cultural Trends, 29.2: 112-128.

Recommended readings:

Stevenson, D. (2020) 鈥楾he unfashionable cultural worker? Considering the demography and practice of artists in Greater Western Sydney鈥,听International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26.1: 61-80.

Allen, K. (2020) 鈥榊oung Women鈥檚 Aspirations and Transitions into, through and away from Contemporary Creative Work鈥 in S. Luckman & S. Taylor,听Pathways into Creative Working Lives, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.听83-99.

Week 10 (3 May): Reading week 鈥 research essay proposal preparation.

Week 11 (10 May): Audiences and participation

Required readings:听

Hadley, S. (2018) Chapter 2 in听Audience development and cultural policy, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25-56.

Jancovich, L. & Stevenson, D. (2019), 鈥楾he 鈥減roblem鈥 of participation in cultural policy鈥 in听B. Eriksson, C. Stage, B. Valtysson (eds),听Cultures of Participation:听Arts, Digital Media and Cultural Institutions,听pp.167-184.

Recommended readings:

Beanman, J. (2016) 鈥楥itizenship as cultural: Towards a theory of cultural citizenship鈥,听Sociology Compass, 10.10: 849-857.

Mihelj, S, Leguina, A, Downey J. (2019) 鈥楥ulture is digital: Cultural participation, diversity and the digital divide鈥,听New Media & Society, 21(7):1465-1485.听

Research essay proposal due.

Week 12 (17 May): Museums, digital media and the pandemic

Required readings:

Samaroudi, S. Rodriguez, K. Echavarria & Perry, L. (2020) 鈥楬eritage in lockdown: digital provision of memory institutions in the UK and US of America during the COVID-19 pandemic鈥,听Museum Management and Curatorship, 35:4, 337-361.

Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M. & Lampis, A. (2020) 鈥業talian state museums during the COVID-19 crisis: from onsite closure to online openness鈥,听Museum Management and Curatorship, 35:4, 362-372.

Recommended readings:

Valtysson, B. (2020) Chapter 2: 鈥楧igital Communication, Digital Media and Cultural Policy鈥, in听Digital Cultural Politics: From Policy to Practice, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.13-46.

Hylland, O. (2017) 鈥楨ven Better than the Real Thing? Digital Copies and Digital Museums in a Digital Cultural Policy鈥,听Culture Unbound, 9.1.

Week 13 (24 May): Course wrap up/essay prep

Recommended reading:

Paquette, J. & Redaelli, E.听(2015) Chapter 6: 鈥楥ultural Policy Research: Ideas, Institutions, and Interests鈥 in听Arts management and cultural policy research, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 77-91.

Research essay due: 2 June.

Learning outcomes are what students know, understand and are able to do on completion of a unit of study. They are aligned with the University's graduate qualities and are assessed as part of the curriculum.

At the completion of this unit, you should be able to:

  • LO1. identify and critically assess theoretical perspectives on cultural policy
  • LO2. analyse cultural policies in relation to the institutional, cultural and political contexts of their emergence
  • LO3. comprehend the range of actors, rationales and factors that bear upon processes of policy formation, implementation and evaluation
  • LO4. assess the relationships between policy, social change and cultural diversity
  • LO5. clearly express well-informed knowledge of cultural policy through written and verbal forms of academic communication.

Graduate qualities

The graduate qualities are the qualities and skills that all 爆料王 graduates must demonstrate on successful completion of an award course. As a future Sydney graduate, the set of qualities have been designed to equip you for the contemporary world.

GQ1 Depth of disciplinary expertise

Deep disciplinary expertise is the ability to integrate and rigorously apply knowledge, understanding and skills of a recognised discipline defined by scholarly activity, as well as familiarity with evolving practice of the discipline.

GQ2 Critical thinking and problem solving

Critical thinking and problem solving are the questioning of ideas, evidence and assumptions in order to propose and evaluate hypotheses or alternative arguments before formulating a conclusion or a solution to an identified problem.

GQ3 Oral and written communication

Effective communication, in both oral and written form, is the clear exchange of meaning in a manner that is appropriate to audience and context.

GQ4 Information and digital literacy

Information and digital literacy is the ability to locate, interpret, evaluate, manage, adapt, integrate, create and convey information using appropriate resources, tools and strategies.

GQ5 Inventiveness

Generating novel ideas and solutions.

GQ6 Cultural competence

Cultural Competence is the ability to actively, ethically, respectfully, and successfully engage across and between cultures. In the Australian context, this includes and celebrates Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, knowledge systems, and a mature understanding of contemporary issues.

GQ7 Interdisciplinary effectiveness

Interdisciplinary effectiveness is the integration and synthesis of multiple viewpoints and practices, working effectively across disciplinary boundaries.

GQ8 Integrated professional, ethical, and personal identity

An integrated professional, ethical and personal identity is understanding the interaction between one鈥檚 personal and professional selves in an ethical context.

GQ9 Influence

Engaging others in a process, idea or vision.

Outcome map

Learning outcomes Graduate qualities
GQ1 GQ2 GQ3 GQ4 GQ5 GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GQ9

This section outlines changes made to this unit following staff and student reviews.

The weekly topics have been updated to take account for developments in the field.

Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism

Academic honesty is a core value of the University, so all students are required to act honestly, ethically and with integrity. This means that the University is opposed to and will not tolerate academic dishonesty or plagiarism, and will treat all allegations of academic dishonesty and plagiarism seriously. The consequences of engaging in plagiarism and academic dishonesty, along with the process by which they are determined and applied, are set out in the Academic Honesty in Coursework Policy 2015. You can find these documents University Policy Register at听听(enter 鈥淎cademic Honesty鈥 in the search field).

Definitions

According to the Policy,听plagiarism听means representing another person鈥檚 work (i.e., ideas, findings or words) as one鈥檚 own work by presenting, copying or reproducing it without appropriate acknowledgement of the source.听Academic dishonesty听means seeking to obtain or obtaining academic advantage for oneself or others (including in the assessment or publication of work) by dishonest or unfair means. Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to:

  • Resubmission (or recycling) of work that is the same, or substantially the same as work previously submitted for assessment in the same or in a different unit of study. Every unit of study expects each student to produce new material based upon research conducted in that unit;
  • Dishonest plagiarism;
  • Engaging another person to complete or contribute to an assessment in your place; and
  • Various forms of misconduct in examinations (including copying from another student and taking prohibited materials into an examination venue).

For further information on academic integrity, check the听听webpage.

Use of Similarity Detection Software

Students should be aware that Assignments submitted in this unit of study may be submitted to similarity detection software. This software searches for matches between text in your written assessment task and text sourced from the Internet, published works, and assignments that have previously been submitted for analysis.

There will always be some degree of text-matching when using this software. Text-matching may occur in use of direct quotations, technical terms and phrases, or the listing of bibliographic material. This does not mean you will automatically be accused of academic dishonesty or plagiarism, although this software reports may be used as evidence in academic dishonesty and plagiarism decision-making processes. Further information about this software is available at听.

Work, health and safety

If you, at any time during the semester, feel unwell or experience flu-like symptoms such as sore throat, cough or fever, please DO NOT come to campus, and contact your lecturer to make alternative arrangements. If you are concered for your health or the health of others, it is recommended that you ring your GP or the University Health Centre to ask for advice.

Disclaimer

Important: the 爆料王 regularly reviews units of study and reserves the right to change the units of study available annually. To stay up to date on available study options, including unit of study details and availability, refer to the relevant handbook.

To help you understand common terms that we use at the University, we offer an .