������

New research from the ������ has found people tend to discriminate in favour of individuals who show a similarity to them, even when the similarity arises from a random event like the flip of a coin. 

Published in , the research runs counter to traditional theories, in particular social identity theory, that assume discrimination occurs because we divide people into groups. It finds, instead, differences between individuals are enough to trigger discrimination. 

Previous research (based on the seminal ‘minimal group’ experiment) showed participants tend to financially benefit members of their own group over a different group. Accordingly, influential theories argued discrimination follows from intergroup relations and social identity.  

New research led by Dr Eliane Deschrijver from the ������’s School of Psychology showed discriminatory tendencies also emerged when participants are not divided into groups and interact only with a single person. 

The study included seven separate experiments and analysed data from over 1400 United Kingdom-based participants. Participants were asked to either repeatedly choose their preferred painting from two (one by Vassily Kandinsky and another by Paul Klee), estimate the number of dots presented in a ‘cloud’ of dots or take part in a coin toss.  

After each choice or coin flip outcome, participants were asked to assign money to another individual. The only information participants were given about that individual was their outcome in the same scenario. Someone asked to pick between two paintings, for instance, was told which painting the person they were allocating money to preferred.  

On average, participants allocated 43.1 per cent more money to another person demonstrating the same judgement or, in the case of the coin toss, the same chance outcome to their own. 

“These findings can have implications for how we understand, and eventually address, discrimination,” said Dr Deschrijver. 

“If humans divide resources unequally after a mere chance difference, discrimination may be more widespread and happen for different reasons than presumed at present. 

“It was always thought discrimination occurs because people are assigned to groups and favour those in their own group over others. Our research demonstrates it’s possible some of our discriminatory tendencies are driven by individual processes.

“The most surprising finding was that participants would discriminate based on a coin flip. This shows us the most randomly derived dissimilarities can drive us to divide resources in unequal ways, which can be a precursor of discrimination.”